HomeLegal EducationLegal WritingThe U.S. Supreme Court Cites MSCD - Adams on Contract Drafting

The U.S. Supreme Court Cites MSCD – Adams on Contract Drafting

In this post from last November, I noted that the U.S. Solicitor General had cited A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting in their brief in a case before the U.S. Supreme Court involving a dispute over an and, Pulsifer v. U.S. Well, two days ago the other shoe dropped: in their opinion in that case (here), the U.S. Supreme Court cites MSCD. (The dissent cites it too.)

I enjoyed that the court’s opinion cites both The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language and MSCD. Both works bear the mark of Rodney Huddleston. He’s co-author of CGEL, but in addition it’s thanks to him that MSCD‘s analysis of what I call “ambiguity of the part versus the whole” makes sense. (See this 2020 blog post for more about that.)

I also enjoyed finding out for myself that the court had cited me. I had thought they might, so every few weeks I’d check to see whether they had issued the opinion. When I checked last Friday, I realized that the opinion had been issued three hours previously, so I quickly found it, searched for “Adams”, then double and triple checked. 🙂

Regarding the implications of this opinion, go here for an NBC News item. This dispute serves as a reminder that ands matter!

Rizwan Ahmed
Rizwan Ahmed
AuditStudent.com, founded by Rizwan Ahmed, is an educational platform dedicated to empowering students and professionals in the all fields of life. Discover comprehensive resources and expert guidance to excel in the dynamic education industry.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments